Having a high-quality gaming router can take your gameplay experience to the next level. In fact, if you’re currently playing with a subpar internet connection, we have to wonder: Are you even gaming? Simply put, a solid gaming router is a vital component of any gamer’s setup — specifically if you’re itching to stream your gameplay of the best multiplayer games to YouTube or Twitch. As you build your epic setup, whether it’s with the newest video game console or a top-notch computer system, keyboard and mouse, the below list of the best gaming routers available will surely guide you on your way to gaming supremacy.
Dealing with an internet connection that moves at a snail’s pace can cause persistent lag, which when gaming can literally (well, sort of literally) be the difference between life and death. The last thing you want is to have your critical split-second in-game decision be undermined by a sluggish online connection. Some gamers fight lag by hardwiring their devices via an Ethernet cable. But if you don’t want to be tethered to a cord — like so many other like-minded gamers — upgrading your wireless router may be the solution you seek.
Before buying any routers for gaming, I’d recommend reading my beginner’s guide to gaming lag to see if there’s anything else you can do to help bring down your ping. In many cases, it could be as easy as moving your wireless router to a different spot or adjusting the angle of a standard router’s antennas. But if you’ve tried all that, and your gaming connection still needs an upgrade, you’re reading the right roundup.
There are plenty of gaming routers out there that promise to boost your gaming performance, but which are truly the best gaming routers? Is it worth splurging on a wireless gaming router that supports the speedy new Wi-Fi 6 standard? That’s what I wanted to know, so I started testing the things out, on a personal quest to find the fastest router to boost my internet connection. This buyer’s guide — which I’ll update periodically — encompasses everything I’ve found so far, starting with the models I think you should zero in on first in your hunt for the best gaming router.
Read more: Best Internet Providers for Gaming
Best gaming routers
All the routers we tested
Along with seeing how today’s gaming routers stacked up against one another, I wanted to get a sense of how they compared with the sort of standard routers that you might be tempted to upgrade from. Given that a few of these gaming routers use next-gen Wi-Fi 6 technology, I made sure to test a few other Wi-Fi 6 routers, too.
All told, that left us with more than a dozen routers to test. Here’s the full list:
- Zyxel Armor Z2 AC2600: $25
- TP-Link Archer A9 AC1900: $100
- D-Link EXO AC2600: $79
- D-Link DIR-867 AC1750: $100
- Linksys EA8300 AC2200: $91
- TP-Link Archer C3150: $198
- Asus RT-AC86U: $170
- Asus ROG Rapture GT-AC2900: $138
- TP-Link Archer AX6000: $202
- Netgear Nighthawk Pro Gaming XR500: $134
- Netgear Nighthawk AX12: $250
- Asus RT-AX86U: $250
- TP-Link Archer C5400X: $308
- Asus ROG Rapture GT-AX11000: $358
How we test gaming routers
Testing routers is a tricky business. Wi-Fi connections are finicky, with lots of variables and key features that will affect your speeds. We do our best to account for those variables in our tests, but some factors are beyond our control — and beyond your router’s control, too.
For instance, your home’s specific internet service provider connection is like a speed limit for your router. If you’re paying for speeds of up to, say, 50 megabits per second, then your router won’t transmit data from the cloud any faster than that. The average ISP download speed in the US is somewhere around 100Mbps, while those living in areas with access to fiber connections might enjoy speeds of 200, 500 or — if they’re really lucky — even 1,000Mbps.
That raises an obvious question: How do you test the top speed of a router like that TP-Link AX6000, which promises Wi-Fi 6 data transfer rates well above 1,000Mbps?
Read more: Best Racing Wheels and Pedals for iRacing
Top speed tests
Our approach bypasses the ISP entirely. Instead of using a modem to pull data from the cloud, we pull data from a local server using a wired connection. Our local server of choice is a MacBook Pro. We connect it to the router using a CAT 7 Ethernet cable to keep interference as low as possible, plus we use an adapter to connect to the MacBook’s Thunderbolt 3 port, since it supports data transfer speeds that are plenty fast for our purposes.
From there, we take a second laptop and connect to the router’s wireless network; then we clock the speeds as we download the data that the router is fetching from the MacBook via that wired connection. We run this test several times on each router’s 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands, and at various distances. In the end, we get a great look at how quickly each router is able to transmit data to a connected device like your phone, gaming PC, gaming laptop or gaming console of choice.
Yes, you’ll see much faster speeds if you connect that gaming console directly to the router via Ethernet cable. We tested those wired speeds too and didn’t see any noticeable difference between any of the routers we measured. Each came within a megabit or two of 940Mbps, which is what you’d expect from a Gigabit Ethernet connection.
As for wireless speeds, the graph above shows the top speeds for each router on both the 2.4GHz band (blue) and the faster 5GHz band (red) at distances of 5, 37.5 and 75 feet.
Here’s what jumps out at me from these results. First, it’s easy to spot the three Wi-Fi 6 routers we tested up at the top — they clocked top speeds on the 5GHz band that were much, much faster than any other router we tested. Bear in mind that we’re running these speed tests on a laptop that supports Wi-Fi 6! If we weren’t, those bars would likely be a lot shorter.
The fastest among them was the TP-Link Archer AX6000, which we measured an average speed of 1,523Mbps on the 5GHz band at a distance of 5 feet. When we increased the distance to 75 feet, the average speed fell to 868Mbps, which is still a faster speed than any of the Wi-Fi 5 routers we tested were able to reach at all, even up close.
I should note that those Wi-Fi 6 routers didn’t blow the competition away on the 2.4GHz band (again, blue). In fact, the router with the fastest average speeds across all distances on the 2.4GHz band was actually the Netgear Nighthawk Pro Gaming XR500, which doesn’t support Wi-Fi 6 at all. Right behind it, the D-Link DIR-867, which also holds the distinction of being the cheapest router we tested for this roundup. That, coupled with the fact that it includes a Quality of Service engine that can prioritize gaming traffic, is what made it an easy value pick among this field.
That Netgear model was also the fastest Wi-Fi 5 router on the 5GHz band, which tells us that it’s a pretty capable piece of hardware. Meanwhile, our top overall pick, the Asus RT-AC86U, was right behind it with the second-fastest Wi-Fi 5 speed on the 5GHz band, though its speed dipped a bit at medium range. The aforementioned DIR-867 and the Zyxel Armor Z2 each scored well in this speed test, too.
One last note: We don’t have full access to our test lab this year as a result of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, so we haven’t been able to run this same test with some of the newer models we’ve reviewed. Once we’re able to test everything in a controlled setting once more, we’ll update this section with fresh data.
Measuring top speeds in a controlled test environment gives us a clear look at what these routers are technically capable of, but you won’t see speeds that fast in your home. Remember, your router can only pull data from the cloud as fast as your ISP speed allows and signal strength will vary from home to home based on the layout and the amount of obstructions in the way.
To account for this, we ran a second batch of tests. This time, I tested each router in my own home, a smallish shotgun-style house of about 1,200 square feet where I have AT&T fiber internet speeds of up to 300Mbps. I ran my speed tests on a Dell XPS 13 laptop that’s a few years old and doesn’t support Wi-Fi 6. The goal was to get a good look at the types of speeds most people would experience if they brought one of these routers into their home.
To gather my data, I ran an abundance of speed tests from five different locations in my home, ranging from the living room where the router lives to a back bathroom on the opposite end of the house. Throughout all of my tests, I always kept a TV streaming live video from PlayStation Vue (RIP) to simulate normal household network traffic in a controlled fashion (and also so my very patient roommate could at least watch TV while politely staying off the Wi-Fi during my tests).
After running multiple speed tests from each of those locations, I averaged everything together. ISP speeds can fluctuate throughout the day, so to help account for this as best as I could, I’d run this whole process again with each router at a later time. Then, I’d average that data with the first batch of tests.
Fourteen routers, five locations in my home, three tests per location, two rounds of tests (at minimum). When you add in the additional tests I ran to double-check a result or measure the impact of specific features, it amounts to roughly 1,000 speed tests and counting.
Those averages proved telling. The top finisher on the 5GHz band turned out to be the Netgear Nighthawk Pro Gaming XR500, which averaged more than 250Mbps across all of my speed tests, including ones in the back of my house where the signal strength is typically poor. The Amplifi HD Gamer’s Edition, which uses plug-in mesh extenders to help relay the signal around the house, was the runner-up — it was one of the worst performers when we measured top speeds, but unless you have a blazing-fast internet connection of 500Mbps or faster, you won’t notice that at all.
As for our top pick, the Asus RT-AX86U, it finished with an overall average download speed of 218Mbps, which is a strong finish and stronger still when you add in the exceptional lag performance.
Meanwhile, it was the bargain-priced D-Link DIR-867 that, once again, led the way on the 2.4GHz band. With an average speed of 85.9Mbps throughout my place, it was the top finisher, but I’d note that speeds dropped considerably at range. In that back bathroom I mentioned, it averaged a download speed of 32.3Mbps, which is about 62% slower than the overall average, and a bigger drop-off than I saw from just about every other router I tested. That tells me that the DIR-867 would work best in small homes like mine — anything bigger, and you’ll want something with better range.
Despite the complete lack of Wi-Fi 6 client devices in my home, the Wi-Fi 6-equipped TP-Link Archer AX6000 was another standout in my tests, with strong average speeds on both the 5GHz and 2.4GHz bands and excellent range from room to room. It saw the smallest dip in speeds in that back bathroom on the 2.4GHz band, and was a top-five finisher by that metric on the 5GHz band, too.
I can’t say the same for the Netgear Nighthawk AX12 or the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AX11000, though. Despite high top speeds in our first round of tests at the lab, neither of those Wi-Fi 6 routers tested well in my home. In fact, they were the two bottom finishers in terms of average overall download speeds on the 5GHz band. Both currently cost around $400 — for my money, the TP-Link Archer AX6000, which you can currently get for $210, is a much better upgrade pick for anyone who’s ready to jump in with Wi-Fi 6. And if you just want the gaming-centric features from the Asus ROG lineup, you’ve got other options that cost less, like the GT-AC2900.
One last point — my glut of at-home speed tests allowed me to take a look at latency, too. As I said before, there’s only so much your router can do to bring lag down, especially if you’re connecting to a busy server that’s thousands of miles away. Still, a good gaming router should help minimize those occasional latency spikes that can be a real killer when they hit your network at a critical moment during an online match.
With that in mind, I made sure to run each of my dozens and dozens of speed tests connecting each router to the same server located a few hundred miles away and I logged the ping to that server each and every time. In most cases, that ping would come in at around 15ms or so, but I also saw plenty of spikes that were a lot higher than that.
The worst offender was the Linksys EA8300, which returned average latencies of 37.5ms on the 2.4GHz band and 35.4ms on the 5GHz — dead last on both fronts. The TP-Link Archer A9 AC1900 struggled on the 2.4GHz band, too, with an average latency of 34.8, though it did manage to do a little better on the 5GHz band, with an average ping just below 20ms.
Read more: Best Game Subscription Services: How to Choose
The best of the bunch? That’d be our top pick, the Asus RT-AX86U. Across 90 speed tests at my home, it didn’t see a single spike above 20ms, which is truly outstanding.
One last point on latency. Most of these gaming routers and others like them will do things like route your gaming traffic to the nearest possible server, or keep you from joining public rooms with especially laggy competitors. Features like those can help prevent common latency pitfalls, but they won’t do much of anything on their own to improve your latency across the board.
What to watch for
We’ll be sure to continue testing new gaming routers in the months ahead, but beyond that, we started to see the very first routers that support Wi-Fi 6E at the end of 2020. Routers like those will add in access to the newly opened 6GHz band, which they get to use as sort of an extra-wide private highway for Wi-Fi 6 traffic. Asus was first to announce a Wi-Fi 6E router, and sure enough, it’s a high-end gaming router.
We’ll continue testing what’s out there, along with budget-priced routers, mesh routers and other high-end, next-gen modern routers of note. Expect regular updates to this post whenever we test new hardware that might be a good fit for gamers and let us know in the comments if there are any specific models or features you’d like us to take a closer look at.